VenomFangX: Fraudster Exposed (PART 4) – Sick Kids Hospital

Posted on August 30th, 2009 by admin

This is a call I made today (4/29/09) to the Sick Kids’ Hospital regarding PCS’s recent fraud. The Administrator there seemed highly upset with this, and promised something would DEFINITELY be done.
Hoorah!

Duration : 0:6:47


[youtube EdFDPIH_Y-E]

25 Responses

  1. Maserati7200 Says:

    “please don’t call …
    “please don’t call them and… spam them” LOL!!!

  2. tmafkap Says:

    Great work on …
    Great work on exposing that lying bastich, LordHathor!

  3. myname1001 Says:

    Amen
    Amen

  4. xenuismaster Says:

    This is disgusting. …
    This is disgusting. If he made the claim that he would hand any donations over $500 to the hospital, then that’s exactly what he should have done.

    There is no excuse for this. He defrauded the public. He should be prosecuted. At the very least he should give all of the money he owes over to the hospital.

  5. stonehartfloydfan Says:

    You in my book are …
    You in my book are a hero my friend. Good work

  6. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    I think YouTube may …
    I think YouTube may have lost the first half of this comment.

  7. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    If, OTOH, he was …
    If, OTOH, he was effectively saying “if you want me to keep the money, please include a note to that effect wih your donation”, then arguably he was trying to be helpful and make sure people’s money went where they wanted it to go, albeit in a very self-interested manner.

    (Yeah, you probably deal with all this in your series. *takes out whip*)

    Kudos to you for taking action though. It needs investigating.

  8. lordhathor Says:

    “he apparently …
    “he apparently receiveed a number of donations in which the donor specifically asked Shawn to keep the money for himself. ”
    In another part of this series (I forget which one) I address this. There was only ONE person who did that, for about $15 I think it was? – and since then, he was e-mailing people, TELLING them to ASK him not to donate their money. *rolls eyes @ PCS*

  9. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    P.S. I’m an atheist …
    P.S. I’m an atheist who thinks VFX is a tool, so believe me, my defence does not spring from any affection I have towards him.

  10. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    What, then, was …
    What, then, was Shawn obliged to hand over to Sick Kids?

    Any amount he received over $500 in any month, but with all those donations which told him to keep the money himself being excluded from the calculations. Oh yeah, and – obviously – any donations explcitly earmarked for Sick Kids.

  11. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    Apparently, this …
    Apparently, this initially showed how much Shawn had received in the current month. However, when donations started coming in with “keep it yourself” messsages, I believe he took the actual figure off the site.

    Anyone who donated money to the site after that would not know whether or not his/her donation would go to Shawn or Sick Kids, so must be presumed as not being that bothered whether their money went to Shawn or to Sick Kids.

  12. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    include them in …
    include them in calculating whether or not he’d reached his $500 monthly limit. The regulation of charity fundraising is partly aimed at protecting the public from fraud and it is a fundamental aspect of charity law that the donor’s wishes should be respected. Shawn is not himself a charity, so was not obliged to keepd donations earmarked for his own use, but he was entitled to.

    The only issue I can see is with the donations tally on his (now defunct) website.

  13. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    Essentially, …
    Essentially, Shawn’s fundraising scheme was to keep the first $500 raised in evey month for himself, and to give any surplus to Sick Kids. However, he apparently receiveed a number of donations in which the donor specifically asked Shawn to keep the money for himself.

    I think he was entitled to treat these donations as having been given outside the terms of his fundraising scheme. Not only was he not obliged to give any part of those donations to Sick Kids, I don’t think he was obliged to…

  14. buggerarsetitwank Says:

    In partial defence …
    In partial defence of Shawn: fom what I’ve read and heard about VFX’s “fundraising scheme”, I don’t think it’s entirely clear that he’s done anything wrong.

    I’ll say now that I’m an English lawyer, so whilst English and Canadian trust/charity law have a common ancestor (couldn’t resist the evo ref), they may now be sufficiently different for my analysis to be totally wrong.

  15. WhistlersBrother Says:

    Dude, you have the …
    Dude, you have the balls everyone should have. I admire you for doing this!!

  16. LordPanties Says:

    A least …
    A least myrmecia1977 can use proper grammar.

    “now why dont you go crawl back into your hole you ing ferret.”

    I learned that a sentence begins with a capital letter in the ing first grade. You are a failure.

  17. DolgLanjelin Says:

    so what’s the story …
    so what’s the story on this?
    I’ve only just today been tipped on this Venomfang guy, and I’ve been sitting on youtube for hours now, looking up on all I can find about this case.

    Have you heard any updates or feedback on the case regarding the money fraud?

  18. lordhathor Says:

    None of it is …
    None of it is deleted. I’ll leave it all here for all the world to see what a retarded little you are. You are the one who deleted your own comment.

    I think the community can judge for themselves, from your comments alone, who is the one that’s right here.

  19. lordhathor Says:

    he’s blocked. I …
    he’s blocked. I don’t censor opinions, but my channel is not the place for this racist bullshit. I hate shawn because he’s a lying, thieving little worm. Not because he’s jewish…. which I didn’t even know until now.

  20. lordhathor Says:

    I read this whole …
    I read this whole conversation, staar, aka ouij.

    You are the one that looks ing retarded. You barely make sense 90% of the time, and the 10% you do make sense, it’s self-deprecating in an unintentional way.

    I don’t know if the guy I’m siding with is religious or not, but seeing as how he’s not you, he’s obviously the better choice. Mymecia is correct.
    Staar/Ouij, you are once again blocked for spam, racism, and retardation.

  21. staarzz82 Says:

    ????????? are you …
    ????????? are you ing disturbed or something? if people read this whole conversation your going to look so ing retarded.

  22. myrmecia1977 Says:

    You can stop …
    You can stop pretending to be tough kid – its just making you look more pathetic than ever.

  23. staarzz82 Says:

    lol. yea im …
    lol. yea im crouched in a dark corner crying my eyes out. yet another hypocritical remark from one of the biggest fools to walk the earth.
    my balls truly are… bouncing… on your mothers… chin… suck, suck, suck the . make it in gleam. wibbily, wobbily, wibbily, wobbily she’s gonna eat my cream :O did you like that? quite a fine lyricist arnt i? now why dont you go crawl back into your hole you ing ferret.

  24. myrmecia1977 Says:

    I think that Ouij4′ …
    I think that Ouij4’s comment was aimed at me, he/she doesn’t handle getting flamed very well. Of course that just makes me feel terrible for the poor little thing ;)

  25. staarzz82 Says:

    so, lordhathor is …
    so, lordhathor is really the other 2 tards ive been replying to. a little pwnage and he signs in to delete it all. lol. and im a coward? i pasted it in the wrong box wit. i reposted further down. are you calling me a bible basher? fighting me as you said? i too am athiest. but your a bad example for all athiests. your idiotic. and i thought you would have heard of bad boy bubby. its australian after all. and just as retarded as yourself. you a sad, sad little yob.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

|
  • Categories

  • Pages

  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Meta

  •